Yes, weird subject line I know. I was reading this book the other day (It's book 2 of the Jane True novels - if this sounds interesting, I
really recommend you start with Tempest Rising, book 1) and I came across a great analysis of why some revered modern fictional relationships actually suck, and why they should really be condemned instead. And it struck me that the following analysis was pretty much the antithesis of BlackHawk, and
that was one of the fundamental reasons I love it so much.
From 'Tracking the Tempest', Nicole Peeler. (page 314)
[...] signifies editing to get to the pertinent parts faster(also, just a warning: the heroine is more than a little drunk at this point)
At Iris' question, I stopped and really tried to break down what it was about Ryu's demands that had bothered me so much. Obviously there was the drama-queen aspect of landing that ultimatum on me, especially after everything we'd just been through. Everything
I had been through. You didn't demand someone make major life changes when they'd been beaten to a pulp the night before. And why did
I have to move? That would be one stonkingly big compromise on my part.
But is compromise such a bad thing? the maraschino cherry in my drink inquired philosophically.
It's the first thing you're taught in kindergarten, after all. How to share each other's toys. I groaned softly, rubbing my palm into my eyes. Then I ate the damn cherry.
"The thing is, Iris, I've never liked the idea of compromise. In films and in stories, people who love each other - really love each other - make horrendous sacrifices. They give kidneys, they move across the world, they
die. Or become the undead, because you know I like that sort of book. Basically, the heroine's lover calls, and she answers. Which is stupid. You know why?"
Iris shook her head.
"Because he's always fucking calling." [...] "So I've never liked that idea, Iris. You know why?" Iris again shook her head. "Because I think that sometimes, when you really love somebody, you don't ask them for the kind of compromise that is actually a sacrifice. The kind where one person gives up everything they have, everything they are, just so they can be with the other person. And you certainly don't
expect that shit. You don't
expect someone to prove their love. To love you that little bit more than you love them."
[...] "What Ryu wants from me," I warned, waggling my finger emphatically in the air, "I can't give him. Not now, and maybe not ever. [...] But I couldn't give him my whole life. And that's what he wanted from me. He wanted everything, and I wanted him to love me for what I had already offered."
The point of all this? Clint and Natasha
aren't like that. They may ask, may even expect the other to give everything, but it's as partners in the field, to get the mission accomplished, and they would ask the same of anyone else on their level (it's a matter of business, you might say).
On a personal level, they don't ask for anything from the other that they aren't ready and able to offer themselves. They will readily make these kinds of sacrifices - these kinds of compromises - for each other. But it's at least partly because they will never
ask it of each other. They love each other solely for what has already been given.
And that's why I adore BlackHawk.
Clint and Natasha may be compromised as individuals, but never as partners. Whether platonic or romantic, theirs is a love
without compromise.
Thoughts? Arguments? Vodka shots?